Leenig v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

93 A. 93, 86 N.J.L. 691, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 316
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 16, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 93 A. 93 (Leenig v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leenig v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 93 A. 93, 86 N.J.L. 691, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 316 (N.J. 1914).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Bogeet, Vredbnburgh, Heppenheimek, Williams, JJ. 9.

For reversal, — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A. 93, 86 N.J.L. 691, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leenig-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nj-1914.