Leef v. Evers

88 Misc. 2d 178, 387 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2643
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 19, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 88 Misc. 2d 178 (Leef v. Evers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leef v. Evers, 88 Misc. 2d 178, 387 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the absence of an appropriate showing by plaintiff of the relevant surrounding circumstances including the efforts, if any, made to obtain the desired information by other means and the alternative unavailability of such information, it was an abuse of discretion to deny appellant’s application to quash the subpoena and to direct it to transmit the specified information.

Order entered February 27, 1975 (Egeth, J.) reversed and motion to quash subpoena granted, with $10 costs.

Concur: Markowitz, J. P., Hughes and Riccobono, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strecker v. Sarafian
153 Misc. 2d 959 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
Holmes v. State
140 A.D.2d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. J.K.
137 Misc. 2d 394 (New York County Courts, 1987)
People v. Private Sanitation Industry Ass'n of Nassau/Suffolk, Inc.
136 Misc. 2d 612 (New York County Courts, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Misc. 2d 178, 387 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leef-v-evers-nyappterm-1976.