Leef v. Evers
This text of 88 Misc. 2d 178 (Leef v. Evers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the absence of an appropriate showing by plaintiff of the relevant surrounding circumstances including the efforts, if any, made to obtain the desired information by other means and the alternative unavailability of such information, it was an abuse of discretion to deny appellant’s application to quash the subpoena and to direct it to transmit the specified information.
Order entered February 27, 1975 (Egeth, J.) reversed and motion to quash subpoena granted, with $10 costs.
Concur: Markowitz, J. P., Hughes and Riccobono, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 Misc. 2d 178, 387 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leef-v-evers-nyappterm-1976.