Leeds v. Yeatman
This text of 12 La. 383 (Leeds v. Yeatman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that no security has been given, and lie contends, that a bond, signed as surety by the same person who was already surety on the injunction bond, offers no new security to him.
We are of opinion, that the conditions of the two bonds being different, the original one being only for damages consequent on the wrongful suing out of the injunction, and the last, that the surety will pay the judgment to be rendered on the appeal, the same person may well sign both, if otherwise unexceptionable; unless he has been, by the judgment appéaled from, condemned as a party, under the act of 1831. '
The rule is therefore, discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 La. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leeds-v-yeatman-la-1838.