Leeds v. El Conquistador Hotel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leeds v. El Conquistador Hotel Corp.

11 A.D.2d 933, 204 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 933 (Leeds v. El Conquistador Hotel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leeds v. El Conquistador Hotel Corp., 11 A.D.2d 933, 204 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, dated July 11, 1960, denying defendants-appellants’ motion to set aside service of the summons and complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. It is evident that the defendant corporations entered this State, and remained here for upwards of one year to transact the only business they had to conduct up to that time. Accordingly, it was properly found that the corporations were “ here ” to such extent as to make the service of process upon them valid and effective. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, dated July 11, 1960, denying defendants-appellants’ motion to set aside service of the summons and complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. It is evident that the defendant corporations entered this State, and remained here for upwards of one year to transact the only business they had to conduct up to that time. Accordingly, it was properly found that the corporations were “ here ” to such extent as to make the service of process upon them valid and effective. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 933, 204 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leeds-v-el-conquistador-hotel-corp-nyappdiv-1960.