Leeds v. Dunn

1 Seld. Notes 209
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leeds v. Dunn. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.Y. 469
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 1853·Published

Opinion

There must be a strict compliance with the terms of a guaranty, or the surety will not be bound.

Where a person engaged to be holden as surety to pay for certain goods to be furnished to the principal debtor, at six months’ credit —the goods were furnished, but by [210]*210the bills of purchase it appeared that part were purchased at four, and part at six months,—Held, that the surety was not liable for any part of the purchase.

(S. C., 10 N. Y. 469.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leeds v. Dunn, 1 Seld. Notes 209 (N.Y. 1853).

1 Seld. Notes 209 (Leeds v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leeds v. . Dunn
10 N.Y. 469 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)