Leeds and Lippincott Company v. United States
276 F.2d 927, 5 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1175, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4955
Opinion
Judge Madden in the District Court held that the transfer of properties and lease back arrangement, here involved, between the taxpayer and the insurance company, was in substance a mortgage, not a sale and therefore taxpayer was not entitled to receive credit for a capital loss.
Under the particular facts and the law of the case (see Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co., 1939, 308 U.S. 252, 60 S.Ct. 209, 84 L.Ed. 226) we must agree.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leeds and Lippincott Company v. United States, 276 F.2d 927, 5 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1175, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4955 (3d Cir. 1960).
276 F.2d 927 (Leeds and Lippincott Company v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sun Oil Company, Transferee, Sunray Dx Oil Company and Subsidiaries, Transferor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
562 F.2d 258 (Third Circuit, 1977)