Lee Van Walton Jr. v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2026
Docket5D2024-1652
StatusPublished

This text of Lee Van Walton Jr. v. State of Florida (Lee Van Walton Jr. v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee Van Walton Jr. v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2024-1652 LT Case No. 2023-CT-001958 _____________________________

LEE VAN WALTON, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Clay County. Kristina Keller Mobley, Judge.

Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Kristie Regan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

April 10, 2026

HARRIS, J.

In this Anders1 appeal, Lee Van Walton, Jr. (“Appellant”) challenges the judgment and sentences imposed after a jury trial

1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). on the charges of Refusal to Submit to DUI Testing and DUI. Appellant has shown no reversible error in the judgment and sentence, and our review of the record likewise has shown no reversible error apparent on its face. See State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987). However, there is an obvious scrivener’s error that should be corrected. The trial court ordered that Appellant’s eight-month jail sentence for Refusal to Submit to DUI Testing and his twelve-month probationary sentence for Driving Under the Influence were to run consecutively. The written judgment and sentence erroneously reflects the sentences running concurrently. Therefore, while we affirm the judgment and sentence entered below, we remand with instructions that an amended judgment and sentence be rendered which correctly reflects that Appellant’s sentences were imposed consecutively.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Causey
503 So. 2d 321 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lee Van Walton Jr. v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-van-walton-jr-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.