Lee v. Yang

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK we Ky ERICA LEE, : Plaintiff, =: 21 Civ. 7934 (LGS) -against- : ORDER ANDREW YANG, et al., : Defendants. : LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, a conference was held on February 23, 2022, to address Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and Defendants’ motion to set aside the Clerk’s Certificate of Default. It is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons stated at the conference, good cause exists to set aside the entry of default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c); Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993). It is further ORDERED that, by March 23, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a letter stating that she will be proceeding pro se or Plaintiffs counsel shall file any notice(s) of appearance. It is further ORDERED that, by March 23, 2022, Defendants shall file any pre-motion letter in anticipation of a motion to dismiss pursuant to Individual Rules HI.A.1 and III.C.2. It is further ORDERED that, by April 13, 2022, Plaintiff shall either file a response to Defendants’ letter or file an amended complaint. It is further ORDERED that discovery is STAYED pending a decision on Defendants’ proposed motion to dismiss. Dated: February 24, 2022 . New York, New York LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE