Lee v. Wightman

New York Supreme Court

Lee v. Wightman

16 N.Y.S. 949, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 954, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2313

DecidedDecember 14, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.Y.S. 949 (Lee v. Wightman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Wightman, 16 N.Y.S. 949, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 954, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2313 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the recovery of commissions as a real--estate broker. The cause was tried at the circuit before a jury, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from the judgment entered upon the verdict, and from the order denying a motion for new trial upon the minutes. The appeal presents no scope for the action of an appellate tribunal. The testimony is somewhat contradictory, and there was room for the jury to criticise the character of both of these parties. The verdict has sufficient support in the testimony, and the judgment and order 'denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

This is an action for the recovery of commissions as a real--estate broker. The cause was tried at the circuit before a jury, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from the judgment entered upon the verdict, and from the order denying a motion for new trial upon the minutes. The appeal presents no scope for the action of an appellate tribunal. The testimony is somewhat contradictory, and there was room for the jury to criticise the character of both of these parties. The verdict has sufficient support in the testimony, and the judgment and order 'denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 N.Y.S. 949, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 954, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-wightman-nysupct-1891.