Lee v. Wickliffe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Lee v. Wickliffe

17 Ky. 110, 1 T.B. Mon. 110, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 160

DecidedOctober 14, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ky. 110 (Lee v. Wickliffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Wickliffe, 17 Ky. 110, 1 T.B. Mon. 110, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 160 (Ky. Ct. App. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court, by

Judge Owsley.

ALL of the persons against whom the bill of Lee was exhibited1, being necessary parties, it was irregular in the court below to pronounce a final decree, dismissing the bill and dissolving the injunction with damages and costs, as to part of the defendants, and continuing the cause for further preparation as to others.

The decree must, therefore, be reversed with costs, the cause remanded and further proceedings had in that court not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court, by

Judge Owsley.

ALL of the persons against whom the bill of Lee was exhibited1, being necessary parties, it was irregular in the court below to pronounce a final decree, dismissing the bill and dissolving the injunction with damages and costs, as to part of the defendants, and continuing the cause for further preparation as to others.

The decree must, therefore, be reversed with costs, the cause remanded and further proceedings had in that court not inconsistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Ky. 110, 1 T.B. Mon. 110, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-wickliffe-kyctapp-1824.