Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

92 So. 3d 930, 2012 WL 3089399

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-6305

StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 3d 930 (Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 92 So. 3d 930, 2012 WL 3089399 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final summary judgment of foreclosure. He argues that summary judgment was improperly entered because there was a disputed issue of material fact regarding the lender’s compliance with the notice requirements for accelerating the mortgage. Appellee concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the judgment on appeal for further proceedings.

Appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied without prejudice. See Termaforoosh v. Wash, 952 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

REVERSED.

DAVIS, LEWIS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI