Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
92 So. 3d 930, 2012 WL 3089399
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of a final summary judgment of foreclosure. He argues that summary judgment was improperly entered because there was a disputed issue of material fact regarding the lender’s compliance with the notice requirements for accelerating the mortgage. Appellee concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the judgment on appeal for further proceedings.
Appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied without prejudice. See Termaforoosh v. Wash, 952 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 92 So. 3d 930, 2012 WL 3089399 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
92 So. 3d 930 (Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Termaforoosh v. Wash
952 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)