Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

430 F. App'x 223

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 23, 2011

DocketNo. 11-1237

StatusPublished

This text of 430 F. App'x 223 (Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 430 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lee appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart and dismissing his state law premises liability complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00367-DWD, 2011 WL 796784 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[224]*224fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lee appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart and dismissing his state law premises liability complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00367-DWD, 2011 WL 796784 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[224]*224fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

430 F. App'x 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-ca4-2011.