Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

430 F. App'x 223

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 23, 2011·No. No. 11-1237·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lee appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart and dismissing his state law premises liability complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00367-DWD, 2011 WL 796784 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[224]*224fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lee appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart and dismissing his state law premises liability complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00367-DWD, 2011 WL 796784 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[224]*224fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 430 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

430 F. App'x 223 (Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.