Lee v. Underhill Wiping Cloth

Second Circuit

Lee v. Underhill Wiping Cloth

13 F. App'x 62

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 11, 2001

DocketDocket No. 00-6374

StatusPublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 62 (Lee v. Underhill Wiping Cloth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Underhill Wiping Cloth, 13 F. App'x 62 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Dennis Lee appeals from a judgment dismissing his amended complaint. We find no error in the district court’s decision that much of Lee’s claim has already been dismissed with prejudice. See Lee v. United States, No. 98 Civ. 7883(SAS), 1999 WL 335830 (S.D.N.Y. May 25, 1999). In any event, his amended complaint did not comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Dennis Lee appeals from a judgment dismissing his amended complaint. We find no error in the district court’s decision that much of Lee’s claim has already been dismissed with prejudice. See Lee v. United States, No. 98 Civ. 7883(SAS), 1999 WL 335830 (S.D.N.Y. May 25, 1999). In any event, his amended complaint did not comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 F. App'x 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-underhill-wiping-cloth-ca2-2001.