Lee v. Town of Mount Pleasant
Opinion
Order granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out seven affirmative defenses alleged in the answer, and denying defendant’s cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We do not pass upon the plaintiff’s right to the various forms of relief demanded in the complaint. We hold merely, as far as the complaint is concerned, that a cause of action is stated. (Adrico Realyy Corp. v. City of New York, 250 N. Y. 29; Moss Estate, Inc., v. Town of Ossining, 268 id. 114.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
256 A.D. 1105 (Lee v. Town of Mount Pleasant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.