Lee v. Town

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 16, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-09854·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED JOHANNA LEE, DOC #: DATE FILED:_ 6/16/2025 Plaintiff, . 1:24-cv-9854-MKV -against- BEN TOWN and MTHREE CORPORATE ORDER OF DISMISSAL CONSULTING LIMITED, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed by the Mediator that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 22]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and if the application to restore the action is made by July 16, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: June 16, 2025 MARY Rav ryKor d New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Town, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Lee v. Town (Lee v. Town) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)