Lee v. . Toler Son

198 S.E. 622, 214 N.C. 823, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 423
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 28, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 198 S.E. 622 (Lee v. . Toler Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. . Toler Son, 198 S.E. 622, 214 N.C. 823, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 423 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

This was a proceeding under the North Carolina Workmen's Compensation Act. Plaintiff claimed compensation for injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by defendant. The Industrial Commission found as a fact from all the evidence that plaintiff did not suffer an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his regular employment resulting in the disability complained of. Upon appeal the award of the Industrial Commission was affirmed, and plaintiff appealed to this Court. There being evidence to support the finding and award of the Industrial Commission, the judgment is affirmed. Lockey v. Cohen, Goldman Co.,213 N.C. 356; Valentine v. Grocery Co., post, 828.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.
196 S.E. 342 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.E. 622, 214 N.C. 823, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-toler-son-nc-1938.