Lee v. State

78 S.W.2d 972

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Tex. Crim. 18 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 6, 1935·No. No. 17303·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is swindling; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is swindling; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Lee v. State, 78 S.W.2d 972 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

78 S.W.2d 972 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.