Lee v. State

100 S.W. 156, 50 Tex. Crim. 643, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 40
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Tex. Crim. 382
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 1907·No. No. 3902.·Published

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violating the Sunday law by working on Sunday, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $10.

There is but one question in this record we deem necessary to review; that is the sufficiency of the evidence. The facts show conclusively, and it is practically conceded by appellant that he did engage in farm work on Sunday. It was not a work of necessity which would exempt appellant from the terms of the statute, or at least the evidence amply supports the converse conclusion. Being a question of fact, the evidence supporting the State’s insistence, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 100 S.W. 156, 50 Tex. Crim. 643, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 40 (Tex. 1907).

100 S.W. 156 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.