Lee v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lee v. State

289 S.E.2d 536, 161 Ga. App. 670, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3068

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 16, 1982

Docket63784

StatusPublished

This text of 289 S.E.2d 536 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. State, 289 S.E.2d 536, 161 Ga. App. 670, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3068 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from an order revoking his probation. Appointed counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which arguably could support the appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if any errors of law occurred. We find that the points raised are without merit and our independent examination discloses no occurrence of any errors requiring reversal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. After a review of the entire record, we find the evidence sufficient to support the finding that appellant was in violation of the conditions of his probation. See generally Barron v. State, 158 Ga. App. 172 (279 SE2d 299) (1981); Walton v. State, 158 Ga. App. 317 (280 SE2d 439) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from an order revoking his probation. Appointed counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which arguably could support the appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if any errors of law occurred. We find that the points raised are without merit and our independent examination discloses no occurrence of any errors requiring reversal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. After a review of the entire record, we find the evidence sufficient to support the finding that appellant was in violation of the conditions of his probation. See generally Barron v. State, 158 Ga. App. 172 (279 SE2d 299) (1981); Walton v. State, 158 Ga. App. 317 (280 SE2d 439) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 S.E.2d 536, 161 Ga. App. 670, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack