Lee v. State
165 S.E. 317, 45 Ga. App. 521, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 594
This text of 165 S.E. 317 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lee v. State, 165 S.E. 317, 45 Ga. App. 521, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 594 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
The evidence connecting the defendant with the offense charged (larceny of an automobile), while circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds only. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCray v. City and County of Denver
354 P.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
165 S.E. 317, 45 Ga. App. 521, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-gactapp-1932.