Lee v. State

76 Ga. 498
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 20, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 76 Ga. 498 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. State, 76 Ga. 498 (Ga. 1986).

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

The plaintiff in error was indicted, tried and convicted of murdering her child, by the superior court of Marion county. The accused moved the court for a new trial on several grounds, which the court overruled, and she excepted and assigns error thereon.

1. There is a total failure in the evidence to establish the corpus delicti.

This must be established beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence shows that Mary Lee had been delivered of a child. The child was found some three hundred yards from her house under a buggy; it was alive and in a healthy condition; it was examined when returned to the mother, and the physician testified that it was well and all right; it was delivered to the mother in this condition; next morning it was dead. The physician testified that there were no marks of violence upon it; he did not know whether it [499]*499died from exposure or had been smothered. It might have died from natural causes.

Clearly from this evidence, no conclusion could be drawn that the child had been murdered; it raised a bare suspicion that such was the case; certainly not enough to authorize the jury to find that this was so; to have so authorized, the evidence should have been so strong and conclusive as to exclude every reasonable doubt that the child was murdered.

2. The evidence is not sufficient to show that the child came to its death at the hands of the mother. The fact is, the whole case rests upon suspicion, and a conviction ought not to be allowed to stand on such a slender foundation.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

AMBLING MANAGEMENT COMPANY v. Purdy
640 S.E.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Brown v. State
262 S.E.2d 497 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Martin v. State
115 S.E.2d 859 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Peters v. State
86 S.E.2d 106 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
McVeigh v. State
53 S.E.2d 462 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Grimes v. State
51 S.E.2d 797 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Logue v. State
32 S.E.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Wrisper v. State
17 S.E.2d 714 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Wells v. State
186 S.E. 593 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Warren v. State
112 S.E. 283 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Langston v. State
106 S.E. 903 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Epps v. State
100 S.E. 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
State v. Merrill
78 S.E. 699 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Ga. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-ga-1986.