Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lee v. State

Lee v. State

108 So. 3d 718, 2013 WL 756337, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3296
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-4690
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 108 So. 3d 718 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. State, 108 So. 3d 718, 2013 WL 756337, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3296 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, Gerodney Lee, seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for reduction/modification/mitigation filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court’s exercise of discretion in a ruling on a motion for mitigation filed pursuant to rule 3.800(c) is not subject to review on appeal. See Adams v. State, 800 So.2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

APPEAL dismissed.

TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeremie Platt v. State
187 So. 3d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Daniels v. State
143 So. 3d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 3d 718, 2013 WL 756337, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.