Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lee v. State

667 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 886, 1996 WL 47700

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 7, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2366

StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 918 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. State, 667 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 886, 1996 WL 47700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence and the restitution as ordered. We remand, however, with directions to delete the awards for court costs, investigative costs, a public defender lien, and a 4% surcharge. See McCray v. State, 665 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may enter a written order reimposing some or all of these charges so long as specific statutory authority is provided for them.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence and the restitution as ordered. We remand, however, with directions to delete the awards for court costs, investigative costs, a public defender lien, and a 4% surcharge. See McCray v. State, 665 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may enter a written order reimposing some or all of these charges so long as specific statutory authority is provided for them.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 886, 1996 WL 47700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack