Lee v. State

557 So. 2d 677, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1269, 1990 WL 18470
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 538 So. 2d 63
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 1990·No. No. 89-01779·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s community control. We find, however, that the reasons cited by the trial court in [678]*678support of its decision to depart upward from the guideline recommendation are invalid. The two reasons specified in the trial court’s written order relate either to appellant’s prior criminal history or to her lack of success on probation. In either instance, departures based on such criteria have been disapproved. Tyner v. State, 491 So.2d 1228 (Fla.1986); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989).

Remanded for resentencing within the guideline range.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 557 So. 2d 677, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1269, 1990 WL 18470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

557 So. 2d 677 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lambert v. State
545 So. 2d 838 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Tyner v. State
491 So. 2d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)