Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lee v. State

462 So. 2d 614, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 294, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12084

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1985

DocketNo. 84-788

StatusPublished

This text of 462 So. 2d 614 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. State, 462 So. 2d 614, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 294, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged with violating two conditions of probation. The evidence at the hearing would support the trial court’s revocation of probation on either of the two grounds. However, the order revoking probation did not state which condition or conditions defendant had violated. Therefore, the case is remanded to the trial court for a correction of the order to indicate which condition or conditions of probation were found to have been violated.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged with violating two conditions of probation. The evidence at the hearing would support the trial court’s revocation of probation on either of the two grounds. However, the order revoking probation did not state which condition or conditions defendant had violated. Therefore, the case is remanded to the trial court for a correction of the order to indicate which condition or conditions of probation were found to have been violated.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

462 So. 2d 614, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 294, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.