Lee v. State

404 So. 2d 860, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1981·No. No. ZZ-331·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lee appeals an order that attempted to correct two illegal “split” sentences — of five years’ probation conditioned on two years’ incarceration — by imposing concurrent indeterminate sentences of two to five years. Imposition of a two-year minimum term for an indeterminate sentence was error, because section 921.18, Fla.Stat. (1979), limits the minimum term in such cases to six months. Cox v. State, 344 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), cert. den., 354 So.2d 979 (Fla.1977). Under Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1981), the corrected sentences are otherwise proper. Therefore, the sentences are AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. The case is REMANDED for correction of the sentences by imposing a minimum term of six months. Appellant need not be present for correction of the sentences.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 404 So. 2d 860, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

404 So. 2d 860 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pack v. State
161 So. 3d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Kantainis v. State
441 So. 2d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)