Lee v. State

402 So. 2d 74, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 368 So. 2d 395
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 1981·No. No. 80-1502·Published

Opinion

SHARP, Judge.

Appellant, Lee, appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He was charged by information with possession of cannabis, possession of methaqualone, possession of paraphernalia and possession of phentermine. His motion to suppress was granted as to the paraphernalia but denied as to the rest of the evidence. Lee pled nolo contendere reserving the right to appeal. He was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to serve one year in jail as a condition of five (5) years probation. The written judgment states that Lee entered a plea of guilty.

We find no error in the denial of the motion to suppress. The evidence seized [75]*75was in open view 1 and fell within an exception to the warrant requirement.2 However, we amend the judgment to correctly state that Lee pled nolo contendere.

AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 402 So. 2d 74, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20761 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

402 So. 2d 74 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cardwell v. Lewis
417 U.S. 583 (Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Chadwick
433 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1977)