Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

541 S.E.2d 700, 246 Ga. App. 720, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 17, 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1343
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 Ga. App. 767
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 8, 2000·No. A99A0601·Published

Opinion

Ellington, Judge.

Bridget Lee and her daughter received significant injuries in a hit-and-run automobile collision caused by an unknown motorist. Pursuant to her uninsured motorist insurance policies, Lee sought recovery for her own injuries as well as the emotional distress she experienced from witnessing her daughter’s suffering and death. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants on Lee’s emotional distress claim. This Court affirmed the trial court’s order. Lee v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co., 238 Ga. App. 767 (517 SE2d 328) (1999).

The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed, holding that, under certain circumstances, emotional distress that results from witnessing another’s injury and suffering is compensable. Lee v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co., 272 Ga. 583 (533 SE2d 82) (2000). Accordingly, our ruling is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Judgment reversed.

Johnson, C. J., Andrews, P. J., Blackburn, P. J., Ruffin, Barnes and Mikell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 541 S.E.2d 700, 246 Ga. App. 720, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 17, 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1343 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000).

541 S.E.2d 700 (Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
533 S.E.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)
Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
517 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)