Lee v. State

94 So. 134, 18 Ala. App. 632, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 272
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 1922·No. 4 Div. 740.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of the offense of forgery in the second degree. There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal being upon the record proper. In this condition of the record we are without authority to consider the special written charges refused to defendant.

The record appears regular in all respects, and, there being no error apparent thereon, the judgment of the circuit court appealed from must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 94 So. 134, 18 Ala. App. 632, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 272 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

94 So. 134 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Lee
94 So. 921 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)