Lee v. State

342 So. 2d 1390, 1977 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1447
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 1, 1977
Docket7 Div. 417
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 So. 2d 1390 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. State, 342 So. 2d 1390, 1977 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1447 (Ala. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinions

BOWEN W. SIMMONS, Retired Circuit Judge.

It appears from the record here on file that appellant was indicted for an unlawful homicide and convicted therefor.

It further appears that within the time provided by law that he appealed from the judgment of conviction and certificate of appeal was filed with this court.

Subsequently thereto, and before the present transcript was mailed or sent to this court, he moved the trial court to withdraw his appeal. The motion was granted, inter alia, by judgment on May 3, 1976, T. 15, Section 381, Recompiled Code 1958, authorizes this procedure.

Thereafter, on June 24, 1976, this court, as an incident to the trial court’s dismissal [1391]*1391of the appeal, dismissed the appeal, thereby terminating this court’s jurisdiction.

Thereafter, on August 10,1976, appellant, through his attorneys, filed in the circuit court his motion in writing to vacate and set aside its order granting petitioner’s motion for withdrawal of appeal dated May 3, 1976, and to reinstate petitioner’s notice of appeal.

The trial court, on August 13, 1976, ordered and adjudged that the motion to vacate the order of dismissal be granted and that the appeal be reinstated.

We do not know of any statutory or other authority for the trial court to reinstate the appeal as it undertook to do in this case. Dismissal of the appeal at nisi prius level is authorized by statute, supra, but a subsequent reinstatement is not authorized.

This court dismissed the appeal at the time and in the manner provided by law and so far as this court is concerned the appeal is not now pending.

The motion of the State to strike the record here filed as an incident to the dismissed appeal has merit. The record is stricken.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable BOWEN W. SIMMONS, a retired Circuit Judge, serving as a Judge of this Court, under the provisions of Section 6.10 of the new Judicial Article (Constitutional Amendment No. 328); his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

MOTION GRANTED; RECORD STRICKEN:

Order of June 24, 1976, dismissing the appeal remains in effect.

TYSON, P. J., and HARRIS, DeCARLO, and BOWEN, JJ., concur. BOOKOUT, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Symanowski v. State
606 So. 2d 171 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 So. 2d 1390, 1977 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-alacrimapp-1977.