Lee v. State
136 Ala. 31
Opinion
Within the meaning of section 4792 of the Code, a place in the yard or curtilage of a private house, forty feet away and open to observation from a public highway — so near and so open that persons traveling the highway can see card or dice playing thereat — is abstractly and per se a public place, and to be so declared by the court as matter of law. The circuit court did not err in giving the charge excepted to by the defendant. — Ford v. State, 123 Ala. 81; Franklin v. State, 91 Ala. 23; Henderson v. State, 59 Ala. 89.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. State, 136 Ala. 31 (Ala. 1902).
136 Ala. 31 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James v. City of Birmingham
926 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (N.D. Alabama, 2013)
Schultz v. State
437 So. 2d 670 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Mitchell v. State
397 So. 2d 169 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Warren v. City of Auburn
337 So. 2d 1319 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976)
Ingram v. State
226 So. 2d 169 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1969)
Tatum v. State
47 So. 339 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Winston v. State
41 So. 174 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Matthews v. State
138 Ala. 674 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1903)