Lee v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Lee v. State

55 Ala. 259

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 15, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 55 Ala. 259 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. State, 55 Ala. 259 (Ala. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J. —

In Floyd v. The State, at tbe present term, we decided tbe main question in tbis cause adversely to tbe present appellant. Tbe Circuit Court did not err in refusing to quasb tbe venire.■ — See Rev. Code, § 4177.

2. We do not tbink there is any thing in tbe objection, that tbe Christian name of tbe defendant is stated under an alias dietus. Some ancient authorities look that way; but such technicality is at war with tbe spirit of our statutes.— Rev. Code, § 4118; Skinner v. The State, 30 Ala. 524; Bryant v. The State, 36 Ala. 2701 Bish. Cr. Proc. §§ 678, 681.

Judgment of Circuit Court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J. —

In Floyd v. The State, at tbe present term, we decided tbe main question in tbis cause adversely to tbe present appellant. Tbe Circuit Court did not err in refusing to quasb tbe venire.■ — See Rev. Code, § 4177.

2. We do not tbink there is any thing in tbe objection, that tbe Christian name of tbe defendant is stated under an alias dietus. Some ancient authorities look that way; but such technicality is at war with tbe spirit of our statutes.— Rev. Code, § 4118; Skinner v. The State, 30 Ala. 524; Bryant v. The State, 36 Ala. 2701 Bish. Cr. Proc. §§ 678, 681.

Judgment of Circuit Court affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Ala. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-ala-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack