Lee v. . Sears, Roebuck Co.
This text of 182 S.E. 493 (Lee v. . Sears, Roebuck Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no error in the exclusion of evidence offered by the plaintiff, or in the admission of evidence offered by the defendants.
Conceding without deciding that there was evidence at the trial tending to show that defendants were negligent, as alleged in the complaint, we concur in the opinion of the trial court that all the evidence offered by the plaintiff, including her own testimony, shows that plaintiff, at least, contributed to her injuries by her own negligence. For this reason, there was no error in allowing defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence, or in the judgment dismissing the action. See King v. Thackers, Inc., 207 N. C., 869, 178 S. E., 95; Clark v. Drug Co., 204 N. C., 628, 169 S. E., 217; Davis v. Jeffreys, 197 N. C., 712, 150 S. E., 488.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 S.E. 493, 208 N.C. 849, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-sears-roebuck-co-nc-1935.