Lee v. Roses

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided July 25, 2002·No. I.C. NO. 270642·Published

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Chapman and the briefs and arguments on appeal. Having reconsidered the material in the file, the Full Commission affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding that plaintiff failed to prosecute this case in a timely manner. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Furthermore, PLAINTIFF SHALL PAY defendant's counsel a reasonable attorney's fee of $500.00 pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-88.1.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/____________________ THOMAS JEFFERSON BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Roses, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Lee v. Roses (Lee v. Roses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 97-88.1
North Carolina § 97-88.1