Home/North Carolina Industrial Commission/Lee v. Roses

Lee v. Roses

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 25, 2002
DocketI.C. NO. 270642
StatusPublished

This text of Lee v. Roses (Lee v. Roses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Roses, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Chapman and the briefs and arguments on appeal. Having reconsidered the material in the file, the Full Commission affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding that plaintiff failed to prosecute this case in a timely manner. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Furthermore, PLAINTIFF SHALL PAY defendant's counsel a reasonable attorney's fee of $500.00 pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-88.1.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/____________________ THOMAS JEFFERSON BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-88.1
North Carolina § 97-88.1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lee v. Roses, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-roses-ncworkcompcom-2002.