Lee v. Rose's 5-10-25c Stores

171 S.E. 87, 205 N.C. 310, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 540
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 11, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 171 S.E. 87 (Lee v. Rose's 5-10-25c Stores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Rose's 5-10-25c Stores, 171 S.E. 87, 205 N.C. 310, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 540 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

The hearing commissioner found that “the plaintiff in tbis ease signed an agreement for compensation in 1930. Compensation was paid and tbe last payment was made on 19 July, 1930. Tbe plain *311 tiff claims to have notified tbe employer on 7 August, 1931, of tbe recurrence of tbe disability caused by tbe injury on 14 May, 1930. Tbe first notice of a recurrence of disability was filed witb tbe Industrial Commission on 2 May, 1932, or nearly two years after tbe final receipt was signed by tbe plaintiff.”

Section 46 of tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act, C. S., 8081 (bbb), provides tbat “no.review shall be made after twelve months from the date of tbe last payment of compensation pursuant to an award under this chapter.”

There was competent evidence to support tbe findings of tbe Industrial Commission tbat tbe last payment of compensation was made on 19 July, 1930. Tbe statute is plain and unambiguous, and no reason occurs why it should not be enforced according to the plain provisions.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.
181 S.E.2d 588 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
Ammons v. Z. A. Sneeden's Sons, Inc.
127 S.E.2d 575 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.
115 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Smith v. Mecklenburg County Chapter American Red Cross
95 S.E.2d 559 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Paris v. Carolina Builders Corporation
92 S.E.2d 405 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Tucker v. Lowdermilk
63 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Wallace v. Campbell Limestone Co.
17 S.E.2d 309 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Knight v. Ford Body Co.
197 S.E. 563 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 S.E. 87, 205 N.C. 310, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-roses-5-10-25c-stores-nc-1933.