Lee v. . Pearce

68 N.C. 90
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 N.C. 90 (Lee v. . Pearce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. . Pearce, 68 N.C. 90 (N.C. 1873).

Opinion

Pearson, C. J.

The only mode by which the exceptions of the defendants to the ruling of his Honor on the question of admissibility of evidence could be presented to this Court, was by a motion for a venire de novo. There having been a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants in the Court below, and the motion for a venire de novo being allowed, upon the exceptions and appeal of the plaintiff, there is nothing presented by the appeal of the defendants for this Court to act on. Indeed, if both .sides asked for a venire de novo, there was no reason why the new trial should, not have been allowed as of course.

The appeal is dismissed as being improvidently taken.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Swarens
241 S.W. 934 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
State v. . Graves
72 N.C. 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 N.C. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-pearce-nc-1873.