Lee v. Peachy
3 Va. 190
Opinion
Delivered the resolution of the Court, that the judgment of the District Court was to be reversed, and that of the County Court affirmed; because, this Court considered the act of limitations as not applying, inasmuch as the plaintiff might have sued the Sheriff’s bond; and, as that right of action was still existing, it could not be true that the act of limitations would bar the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. Peachy, 3 Va. 190 (Va. Ct. App. 1802).
3 Va. 190 (Lee v. Peachy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.