Lee v. Peachy

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Lee v. Peachy

3 Va. 190

DecidedMay 7, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 190 (Lee v. Peachy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Peachy, 3 Va. 190 (Va. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

LYONS, Judge.

Delivered the resolution of the Court, that the judgment of the District Court was to be reversed, and that of the County Court affirmed; because, this Court considered the act of limitations as not applying, inasmuch as the plaintiff might have sued the Sheriff’s bond; and, as that right of action was still existing, it could not be true that the act of limitations would bar the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LYONS, Judge.

Delivered the resolution of the Court, that the judgment of the District Court was to be reversed, and that of the County Court affirmed; because, this Court considered the act of limitations as not applying, inasmuch as the plaintiff might have sued the Sheriff’s bond; and, as that right of action was still existing, it could not be true that the act of limitations would bar the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-peachy-vactapp-1802.