Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
This text of 670 F. App'x 777 (Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles T. Lee appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:13-cv-00004-MR-DSC, 187 F.Supp.3d 623, 2016 WL 2746626 (W.D.N.C. May 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-norfolk-southern-railway-co-ca4-2016.