Lee v. . Norcom

16 N.C. 372
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.C. 372 (Lee v. . Norcom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. . Norcom, 16 N.C. 372 (N.C. 1830).

Opinion

Ruffin, Judge.

— This cause was removed for original hearing in this Court, under the act of 1818. (Rev. c. 962, s. 5.) The construction of which is, that the whole case and the original papers are to be sent. It is not like an appeal. In this last, the decree is that of the Court below, and this Court reverses or affirms it. The pleadings and proofs must therefore remain below, as the foundation of the decree. But upon removals, the decree is altogether the act of this Court. The Clerk and Master of Chowan ought not therefore to have sent a transcript; and he cannot charge the. parties the fee for making it. His bill of costs must be reformed by sud sting that item out.

Per Curiam.

— Let the costs of the copies sent to tide Court be stricken from the bill of costs. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.C. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-norcom-nc-1830.