Lee v. Newland
30 A. 258, 164 Pa. 360, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1083
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 181·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
We find no error in this record that would justify a reversal of the judgment. All the questions properly presented by the specifications of error were rightly decided by the learned president of the court below. It is unnecessary to add anything to what is so well said in his opinion; and on that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. Newland, 30 A. 258, 164 Pa. 360, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1083 (Pa. 1894).
30 A. 258 (Lee v. Newland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Proctor v. Sagamore Big Game Club
166 F. Supp. 465 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1958)
Pittsburgh Petition
103 A.2d 721 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Scranton v. O'Malley Manufacturing Co.
19 A.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
City of Uniontown v. McGibbons
174 A. 912 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
McNutt v. Somerset County
17 Pa. D. & C. 525 (Somerset County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Grakelow v. Nash
98 Pa. Super. 316 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Burke v. Harkins
146 A. 94 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Smith v. Miller
137 A. 254 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Central Pennsylvania Lumber Co. v. Bristol
95 A. 383 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Osmer v. Sheasley
68 A. 965 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Canole v. Allen
28 Pa. Super. 244 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)