Lee v. New York, Ontario & Western Railroad

222 A.D. 825

This text of 222 A.D. 825 (Lee v. New York, Ontario & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. New York, Ontario & Western Railroad, 222 A.D. 825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Order dismissing complaint and judgment entered thereon reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. Jury questions were presented by this record, based on whether the rails were so shaped and placed in juxtaposition at such a distance as to permit the caulk of the horse’s shoe to become wedged in and to cause injury, and as to whether this and the manner of maintenance thereof constituted negligence. (Stebbins v. Hudson Valley Railway Co., 170 App. Div. 1; Lowell v. Central Vermont R. R. Co., 15 id. 218; Cotton v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 48 N. Y. St. Repr. 89.) Young, Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stebbins v. Hudson Valley Railway Co.
170 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D. 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-new-york-ontario-western-railroad-nyappdiv-1928.