Lee v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lee v. New York City Transit Authority

294 A.D.2d 337, 741 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 294 A.D.2d 337 (Lee v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. New York City Transit Authority, 294 A.D.2d 337, 741 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated February 6, 2001, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority which was for summary judg[338]*338ment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Santucci, J.P., Altman, McGinity and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated February 6, 2001, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority which was for summary judg[338]*338ment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Santucci, J.P., Altman, McGinity and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 337, 741 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2002.