Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

503 S.W.3d 234, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 725, 2016 WL 4011321

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 26, 2016

DocketWD 79199

StatusPublished

This text of 503 S.W.3d 234 (Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, 503 S.W.3d 234, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 725, 2016 WL 4011321 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Remon Lee appeals from the grant of a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole in Lee’s declaratory judgment action challenging the Board’s calculation of his parole eligibility on a thirty-year sentence for armed criminal action, entered under § 571.015, RSMo 2000. Lee argues that, under § 571.015, the minimum time he must serve on the armed criminal action sentence before becoming parole eligible is three years; thus, he argues, the Board’s determination that he must serve a minimum of nine years and eleven months is incorrect. We find no error and affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Remon Lee appeals from the grant of a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole in Lee’s declaratory judgment action challenging the Board’s calculation of his parole eligibility on a thirty-year sentence for armed criminal action, entered under § 571.015, RSMo 2000. Lee argues that, under § 571.015, the minimum time he must serve on the armed criminal action sentence before becoming parole eligible is three years; thus, he argues, the Board’s determination that he must serve a minimum of nine years and eleven months is incorrect. We find no error and affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 S.W.3d 234, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 725, 2016 WL 4011321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-missouri-board-of-probation-parole-moctapp-2016.