Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

391 S.W.3d 927, 2013 WL 703911, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 220

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 2013·No. No. WD 75046·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert G. Lee appeals the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment for failure to state a claim. The petition alleged that the Board of Probation and Parole erroneously relied on false information in denying Lee parole thus denying Lee due process. The petition sought a new parole hearing and an injunction prohibiting reliance on the false information. Because Lee does not have a protected liberty interest in parole release, and his allegations were insufficient to state a claim that his due process rights were violated, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert G. Lee appeals the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment for failure to state a claim. The petition alleged that the Board of Probation and Parole erroneously relied on false information in denying Lee parole thus denying Lee due process. The petition sought a new parole hearing and an injunction prohibiting reliance on the false information. Because Lee does not have a protected liberty interest in parole release, and his allegations were insufficient to state a claim that his due process rights were violated, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, 391 S.W.3d 927, 2013 WL 703911, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 220 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 927 (Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.