Lee v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
This text of 29 Misc. 774 (Lee v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant has argued only the questions of law, consisting of exceptions taken to the admission of" evidence upon the trial, and. claims that special damages, not. alleged, were allowed to be proven.
We have carefully examined the record and find no merit in the exceptions. The complaint seems broad' enough to comprehend, every item of damage proved or recovered.
The verdict is moderate in amount; and there being no error,, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.
Conlan, J., concurs.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Misc. 774, 60 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nynyccityct-1899.