Lee v. McCarty

64 S.E. 997, 132 Ga. 698, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 389
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 17, 1909·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The undisputed evidence required a finding for the defendant ; and if there were any errors in some of the rulings of the court or inaccuracies in the charge, they were not such as to necessitate a new trial.

2. Sufficient foundation was laid as to the loss of the deed under which defendant prescribed, to adinit secondary evidence thereof.

3. A refusal to allow an amendment to a petition and sustaining a demurrer thereto furnishes no ground for a motion for a new trial. Turner v. Barber, 131 Ga. 444 (62 S. E. 587); Hawkins v. Studdard, 132 Ga. 262 (63 S. E. 852); Leathers v. Leathers, 132 Ga. 211 (63 S. E. 1118).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. McCarty, 64 S.E. 997, 132 Ga. 698, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 389 (Ga. 1909).

64 S.E. 997 (Lee v. McCarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manry v. First National Bank
23 S.E.2d 662 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Cohen v. Macks
165 S.E. 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Lewis v. Banks
154 S.E. 785 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Brown v. Wilkes
92 S.E. 553 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Tompkins v. American Land Co.
77 S.E. 623 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Lynah v. Citizens & Southern Bank
75 S.E. 652 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)