Lee v. Mayfield

197 So. 2d 373, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 5694
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 22, 1967
DocketNo. 10777
StatusPublished

This text of 197 So. 2d 373 (Lee v. Mayfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Mayfield, 197 So. 2d 373, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 5694 (La. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

BOLIN, Judge.

This case was consolidated with Lee v. Sanders et al., La.App., 197 So.2d 371.

Since defendant Mrs. Joseph Mabry May-field has not perfected an appeal, the judgment of the lower court as it affects her is not before us. For the reasons assigned in Lee v. Sanders, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed and recast at appellants’ cost, and

It is ordered that plaintiffs, Beulah Lee and David Lee, have the right to the possession of and are hereby maintained in possession of:

Lot 3, Block E, Mooring Partition, Section 10, Township 19 North, Range 16 West, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, per plat filed in Conveyance Book 50, page 123 of the Conveyance Records of Caddo Parish, Louisiana,

and that the defendants, R. M. Sanders and Ida B. Sanders, are ordered to assert any adverse claim of ownership to the above [374]*374described land in a petitory action to be filed within sixty (60) days after the date this judgment becomes executory, or such defendants shall be precluded thereafter from asserting ownership to the above described property.

Affirmed and recast.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. Sanders
197 So. 2d 371 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 So. 2d 373, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 5694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-mayfield-lactapp-1967.