Lee v. Manpower

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedSeptember 30, 2003
DocketI.C. NO. 983848.
StatusPublished

This text of Lee v. Manpower (Lee v. Manpower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Manpower, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Opinion

***********
This matter was reviewed by the Full Commission based on the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Gheen, along with the briefs and arguments on appeal. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or to amend the prior Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
EXHIBITS
Plaintiff (hereinafter "Lee") offered various medical records at hearing that defendants (hereinafter collectively "Manpower") stipulated. The documents below, denominated "Court," were received following the hearing before the deputy commissioner pursuant to directives issued at hearing. The following documents are introduced into evidence as:

1. Stipulated Exhibit #1: Lee's medical records.

2. Court #1: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services report.

3. Court #2: Medical records of Dr. Charles P. Bond (hereinafter "Dr. Bond").

4. Court #3: Medical records of Dr. Dan. A. Gold.

***********
The competent evidence of record engenders the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Lee was forty-three years old on the date of hearing. Prior to her employment by Manpower, Lee was a meat packer for approximately eight years.

2. On September 15, 1999, Manpower employed Lee, assigning her to Allied Diecasting. Lee performed different duties at Allied involving the use of her hands generally with fine motor manipulation and grasping. She was last assigned to file metal flashings used in the construction of lawn mower housings. The filing was hard to perform in any single position and Lee, therefore, changed body positions as needed to perform her duties.

3. Lee performed filing for one day on October 18, 1999. At the end of the workday, Lee's fingers started swelling on her right hand and both thumbs were numb. She can recall nothing unusual that occurred while she was working.

4. Lee called Manpower the next morning reporting her condition. Manpower arranged a medical examination for Lee at Occupational Medicine in Rutherford Hospital on October 19, 1999. Lee demonstrated positive results for mild nerve compression; a mild Phalen test, a positive Tinel sign and a negative Finkelstein test. The initial diagnosis was right wrist tendonitis. Wrist splints, medications and an exercise regimen were prescribed. She was released to return to work with restrictions of no lifting greater than fifteen to twenty-five pounds periodically, rotation of job duties every three or four hours and limited use of both hands, especially repetitive motions.

5. Manpower filed a Form 19, Employer's Report of Employee's Injury to the Industrial Commission, on or about October 20, 1999. Manpower reported Lee developed swelling and numbness to her left thumb and right index finger and thumb as a result of a sprain. The information on the Form 19 is consistent with the initial diagnosis at Occupational Medicine.

6. Lee returned to Occupational Medicine on October 26, 1999. Lee reported she had obtained minor relief from her symptoms, but her hands continued to be very swollen at the end of work. Medical care providers observed mild edema in the right hand greater than the left. Compression, Tinel and Phalen tests were again positive. Lee's diagnosis changed to bilateral, right greater than left wrist tendonitis versus early carpal tunnel syndrome. Splints and medications, including several new medications, were continued. Occupational Medicine wanted to refer Lee for physical therapy, but Manpower would not authorize the treatment. Occupational Medicine referred Lee for nerve conduction studies at Neurological Associates of Rutherford. Manpower authorized the studies.

7. Lee was released to return to work on October 26, 1999. No physical restrictions were assigned because she was not working at the time. Her medical care provider noted that if Lee returned to work she should avoid jobs requiring repetitive motions.

8. Lee unsuccessfully attempted to return to work for two days at Manpower. Lee had a one-day assignment on November 1, 1999 and another one-day assignment on November 8, 1999. Lee has not worked at Manpower or any other employment for two and one-half years as of the date of hearing in this matter. She has sought employment at Rutherford County Schools, Dollar General Store in a position other than a cashier, and at a food store.

9. Dr. Anne M. Jackson (hereinafter "Dr. Jackson") performed nerve conduction studies on November 23, 1999. The results demonstrated mild to moderate bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome.

10. Manpower referred Lee to Dr. Charles D. Bond (hereinafter "Dr. Bond"). Dr. Bond examined Lee on December 21, 1999 and diagnosed bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Surgery was recommended but not authorized by Manpower. Lee's splints were continued and prescription medication prescribed. Dr. Bond restricted Lee to, no lifting greater than ten pounds, no repetitive motion of the hands and no strenuous gripping.

11. Manpower filed three Industrial Commission Forms on January 10, 2000 as follows:

a) Form 60, Employer's Admission of Employee's Right to Compensation Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-18(b). The Form 60 (emphasis added) advised Lee that Manpower "admits your right to compensation for an [x] injury by accident on October 18, 1999." The section admitting an occupational disease is blank. Manpower also stamped the document "Subject To Wage Verification." The description of the injury was "Left Thumb Right Index Finger," but the method of injury was not mentioned. Manpower reported that disability resulted on October 26, 1999 and compensation commenced on October 26, 1999.

b) Form 28, Return to Work Report. Manpower reported that Lee's disability began on October 19, 1999 and ended on November 2, 1999, the date that Lee secured one day of employment.

c) Form 28B, Report of Employer or Carrier/Administrator of Compensation and Medical Compensation Paid and Notice of Right to Additional Medical Compensation. Manpower indicated that one week of temporary total disability was paid in the amount of $140.41, being paid on December 1, 1999. Medical compensation was reported as $1,420.63, and did not represent final medical compensation. Manpower represented that the report was not final.

12. Manpower offered no reason of record for filing the Form 60 as an "accidental" injury or reasons for denying Lee's claim once the Form 60 had been filed.

13. Dr. Bond examined Lee on January 20, 2000. Lee's condition had not improved and Dr. Bond again recommended surgery. Dr. Bond tentatively scheduled the surgery for the following week. Dr. Bond certified that Lee could return to work with no lifting greater than five pounds and no repetitive motion of the hands. Manpower declined to pay for the surgery.

14. Manpower employed a nurse who accompanied Lee to Dr. Bond's office on both visits and actively engaged Dr. Bond regarding the course of this claim. The greater weight of the evidence establishes that Manpower's nurse communicated with the adjuster in charge of this claim and Manpower was fully aware of Lee's diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome on January 10, 2000 when the Form 60 was filed.

15. Manpower's contention at hearing that the Form 60 admits liability for Lee's tendonitis and is not an admission of liability for Lee's carpal tunnel syndrome is unpersuasive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. U.S. Air, Inc.
463 S.E.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
Sims v. Charmes/Arby's Roast Beef
542 S.E.2d 277 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Calhoun v. Wayne Dennis Heating & Air Conditioning
501 S.E.2d 346 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1998)
Deese v. Champion Int'l Corp.
532 S.E.2d 524 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lee v. Manpower, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-manpower-ncworkcompcom-2003.