Lee v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lee v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.

260 A.D.2d 549, 686 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4099

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered April 22, 1998, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the instant motion is procedurally barred by the single-motion rule of CPLR 3211 (e) (see, Grosso Moving & Packing Co. v Damens, 233 AD2d 128).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered April 22, 1998, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the instant motion is procedurally barred by the single-motion rule of CPLR 3211 (e) (see, Grosso Moving & Packing Co. v Damens, 233 AD2d 128).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Lee v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc., 260 A.D.2d 549, 686 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

260 A.D.2d 549 (Lee v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related