Lee v. Lee

83 A.D.2d 841, 441 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 A.D.2d 221

Opinion

In a “special proceeding”, inter alia, to “[v]acate the second decretal paragraph of the Findings and Judgment” of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 17, 1975, George Thomas Lee, Jr., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), dated August 11, 1980, which denied his application. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Reeves v Reeves, 57 AD2d 661). We note that subdivision a of section 232 of the Domestic Relations Law was amended by the Laws of 1978 (ch 528, § 6) so as to provide that in an action for divorce, if the complainant is not “personally served” with the summons, in addition to the summons stating “ ‘Action for a divorce’ ”, it “shall specify the nature of any ancillary relief demanded.” This amendment, however, did not become effective until January 1, 1979. The summons at bar was served sometime prior to the 1975 divorce judgment. Titone, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Lee, 83 A.D.2d 841, 441 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

83 A.D.2d 841 (Lee v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeves v. Reeves
57 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)